#150
From: PGM::IF_
To: @DIS:NC,WIE,HSE
CC: IF_
Subj: Policy on Ken
TO:@DIS:NC,WIE,HSE
FROM:LAR "Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. "
CC:HZL
SUBJ:POLICY ON KEN KRONBERG SUICIDE
April 18, 2007 (10:21am) EDT
Evidence presently placed at my disposal has now shown me
the actually determining personal factor in the suicide ofKen
Kronberg, Thisadditional evidence corresponds precisely
with both my personal knowledge of both Ken, and also the
business circumstances within which his actions weresituated.
At some later time, it will be appropriate to disclose atleast a
significant aspect of that evidence. That, evidenceincludes,
essentially, not so much the cause of Ken's suicide, butcertain
usually overlooked, but crucial, aggravating
situation, factors which are to be traced, for emphasis, to
evidence dating chiefly from the period when Ken was under
the joint misdirection of Fernando Quijano and Uwe Friesecke
during the early through late 1990s.
Therefore, since Nancy Spannaus' already published version
of the biographicalnote, is truthful in respect to what it
includes, that should be the only official reference toKen's
passing made publicly by our association at this time.
In coming times...
During the immediate months ahead, I will come to share my
present, other knowledge on the matter,
who have relevant competence, or who have a special right to
know. Although theessentials of the case are now clear to me,
there are relevant supplementary factors, including thealready
Press RETURN for more...
MAIL>
#150
known current British operation by the friends and
accomplices of Al Gore against our association, which must
still be more fully explored.
It should be recalled, that I am exceptionally good at
intelligence work, with a record, in my areas ofspecialization,
far exceeding that of most known professionals otherwise.
Intelligence is, as my experience, more likely to beaccurate in
identifying the nature of the relevant situation, than inlocating
the detailed features of the subject-matter.
the character of the problem, but must no exclude surprises
which now turn up as factors to be considered in pinningdown
the details which make for detailed evidence of what Ialready
know the nature of the subject to be.
30-30-30
MAIL>