LaRouche's response to the 1994 death of Michael Gelber

1. LaRouche's official statement

2. Dennis King comments on LaRouche's statement

3. "In Memoriam" article from LaRouche's newspaper

4. Helga LaRouche profiteers off Gelber's death

5. LaRouche's exploitation of Gelber and others to save his own hide from felony charges

1. LaRouche's official statement

This is Lyndon LaRouche on the subject of my dear, recently departed friend, Michael Gelber.

There are, in my view, three levels of good persons in society. There are those who pursue their personal family interests with a desire to do nothing bad, and a desire to raise their family and conduct their affairs in a moral fashion. Second, there are those on a somewhat higher level, who shape the conduct of their lives in such a way as to contribute some significant good to society around them, and share with their family the idea of dedication of the family to contributing to this good as a primary purpose in life.

There are those on the third and still higher level, who dedicate their lives not only to serving the good but to combatting the evil, even when evil seems to have overwhelming preponderance of force. These are rare and remarkable people who are given to us not by accident, but because of roots in some family experience, a strong moral motivation takes root in them and grows, blossoms, as it did with Michael.

It is difficult at this stage to describe adequately what Michael has done, how much good he has contributed. But it can be said that he is one of a relatively tiny few who have stood for more than a pair of decades in the front lines of combat against evil, when evil was supported or tolerated by a majority of his fellow citizens. And not only fought against this evil, but has fought consistently, lovingly, and with dedication to the good.

We shall miss him very much, but it is within our power only to do certain other things. First, to continue the fight, so that his work shall not have in any case been done in vain. Second, we shall recognize the well-springs of that potential for goodness within him which made him what he was and what he could have become had he lived longer.

And thus to his family we can say, here is a man who came from the bosom of your family, who brought to society a spark of goodness which is rare in all mankind today, and who developed that spark and served it as only a rare few have done in this time. It is a great loss, but it is also a great joy to have had him.

2. Dennis King comments on LaRouche's statement

The above statement was written by the NCLC chairman shortly after Gelber's death in a late-night auto crash in January 1994. LaRouche apparently was still in prison but was awaiting parole. Note that LaRouche talks about Gelber only as an instrument of LaRouche's own political fantasies of destroying the forces of "evil." Indeed, LaRouche's repulsive dividing of humanity into relative levels of metaphysical worth in this document forecloses any consideration of Gelber's value as a human being APART FROM his slavish service to Lyn and Helga. And even in LaRouche's praise for this service there is a sly ambiguity (as in LaRouche's relationships in general with his Jewish followers dating back to the 1960s): "It is difficult at this stage," he opines,"to describe adequately what Michael has done, how much good he has contributed." Already the NCLC chairman must have been ruminating over the need to eventually purge the boomers, especially those of Jewish descent.

Note that LaRouche avoids any apology for his own mistakes that resulted in Gelber going to prison for a year as an accomplice of LaRouche's own white-collar crimes. Note also that LaRouche does not apologize for the ruthless overworking of Gelber and other "organizers," and the unsafety of the beat-up cars with treadless tires they were provided for driving around icy roads late at night while suffering from perennial lack of sleep. Finally note LaRouche's brief reference at the end to Gelber's family--he doesn't even bother to address them by name, not even Gelber's wife who was herself a loyal NCLC member. As to the rest of the family, LaRouche probably didn't even know the names of these people who had experienced devastation not only after Michael's death but from his recruitment many years earlier to the all-consuming, family-denying NCLC cult. In an appalling display of crassness LaRouche talks about how Michael "came from the bosom of his family" into the NCLC. It would be more accurate to say that he was ripped from the bosom of his family through the cult's ego-stripping process so that LaRouche could savor the sadistic "joy" of having yet another Jewish slave to help him fight against the "evil" you-know-who's.

3. "In Memoriam" article from LaRouche's newspaper

[The following statement appeared in The New Federalist, the LaRouche movement's now-defunct newspaper, shortly after Gelber's death. Unlike LaRouche's own statement, that of the paper's editors at least acknowledges Gelber had a wife--it even provides her name--and alludes vaguely to the existence of his parents and brothers, although I doubt these "bronze souls" (as LaRouche would have regarded them) were comforted by the reference to Gelber's role as a front-line fighter in the battle of the "golden souls" against the forces of "evil."--DK]

It is with deep sadness that we report that, on Jan. 11, 1994, Michael Gelber was killed in an automobile accident while on an organizing tour in upstate New York.

Gelber, who would have been 43 next month, had been a spokesman and a fighter for the policies and principles of the political movement associated with Lyndon LaRouche for his entire adult life. As those who knew him and worked with him knew full well, Gelber never gave less than his entire being at any moment.

Michael Gelber became an activist with LaRouche-led National Caucus of Labor Committees in 1972. His training in Special Education had perhaps given him a unique sense of organizing. He led local organizing activities and campaigns in St. Catherines, Ontario, and Syracuse, N.Y. in the mid- and late 1970s, and played a leadership role at the end of the 1970s and beginning of the 1980s in organizing in Boston, Mass. on behalf of the LaRouche movement.

In Boston, for example, Gelber waged a campaign which became notorious there: the "Before Hitler, There Was Harvard'' campaign, which exposed the Malthusian, zero-growth racism of the Harvard eugenicists and anti-immigrationists--outlooks inculcated at Harvard as part of the training of an Anglo-American elite. Gelber also made a name for himself with his powerhouse election campaign for Mayor; he subsequently ran for other elected offices as well. In the course of those electoral bids, Gelber made the drug-money laundering by Boston's infamous Vault one of his top targets.

Michael Gelber was among those persecuted by the U.S. Justice Department-ADL "Get LaRouche'' Task Force, and served a one-year sentence in federal prison for the good he had done.

A Love of Life

No one has ever been more anxious to return to organizing than Mike was after his prison term. To those who knew him, he was among those people, too often underappreciated, too often unsung, who do so much for humanity. He had a unique flair for being, as it were, egregious with his political foes, often standing alone for right against opinion and against goons whose bulk was many times his slight build. He combined with that a love of life and of people that is difficult to match.

In a statement issued Jan. 16, the day of Michael Gelber's funeral, Lyndon LaRouche remembered him, saying that he and people like him "are rare and remarkable people who are given to us not by accident, but because of roots in some family experience, a strong moral motivation takes root in them and grows, blossoms, as it did with Michael.

He is one of a relatively tiny few who have stood for more than a pair of decades in the front lines of combat against evil, when evil was supported or tolerated by a majority of his fellow citizens. And not only fought against this evil, but has fought consistently, lovingly, and with dedication to the good.

To his family we can say, here is a man who came from the bosom of your family, who brought to society a spark of goodness which is rare in all mankind today, and who developed that spark and served it as only a rare few have done in this time. It is a great loss, but it is also a great joy to have had him.''

He will be deeply missed. Michael Gelber is survived by his wife Debra, like him a longtime LaRouche associate, and by his parents, brothers, and the millions of children of this world whom he loved, and lived and fought for.

4. Helga LaRouche profiteers off Gelber's death

[LaRouche's wife Helga quickly figured out how to profit from Gelber's death. According to an article in The New Federalist in the fall of 1994, Helga's Schiller Institute had established a "Michael Gelber Memorial Fund" to provide "travelling fellowships" for LaRouchian organizers "to go to Europe, in order to relive the 600-year war between the Renaissance and the Oligarchy.'' (I wonder how many Alzheimer's patients helped pay for this scam. . . .) The New Federalist reported that the first two fellowship recipients had just left for the Continent, but let's be clear: they didn't go over there for educational purposes, wacky or otherwise. They went to help in the LaRouche organization's fundraising for Lyn and Helga' personal comfort, and to disseminate hate-drenched propaganda in furtherance of Lyn's crypto-Nazi fantasies. So little did the Schiller Institute and The New Federalist care about the human being Michael Gelber that, only a few months after his death, they couldn't even remember which year he had died in (it was 1994, not the 1993 date erroneously given below).--DK]

A resolution creating the Michael Gelber Memorial Fund was passed at the September 1994 annual meeting of the Schiller Institute Board of Directors, in commemoration of long-time Schiller Institute member and activist Michael Gelber. Michael's premature and tragic passing in late 1993 has left a void in Schiller Institute activities that is still felt to this day.

The purpose of the Fund, according to the resolution, is to "give American organizers of the Schiller Institute the opportunity to go to Europe, in order to relive the 600-year war between the Renaissance and the Oligarchy.''

It is the desire of Debra Gelber, Michael's wife, ``that the American organizers who participate in this program are able to come back with those qualities that Michael Gelber embodied: to profoundly communicate these ideas to their fellow Americans who have been sadly cheated out of the Golden Renaissance.''

The first recipients of this "travelling fellowship,'' Peter Bowen and Jeffrey Orr, left for Europe in early September.

Those wishing to contribute to the Fund, should make their checks payable to the Schiller Institute Michael Gelber Memorial Fund, and mail them to [address deleted].

5. How LaRouche exploited Gelber and others in an attempt to save his own hide from felony charges

"Five years of their lives had been wasted being 'safehoused' here and there abroad--years of their lives stolen--just because LaRouche was too cowardly and stupid to let the original grand jury take its course, and let the organization take its lumps."

By a former LC member

Mike Gelber was one of the three, along with Chuck Park and Rick Sanders, who were the targets in the Boston credit card investigation. So, rather than having them appear before a grand jury, LaRouche and some of his lawyers decided to ship them out of the country--that is, make them into fugitives from justice--and KEEP them there for years. They vanished from the U.S. in the fall of 1984, before the LaRouche organization moved to Virginia.

Most of the people in the LaRouche organization knew where they had gone, but they got the sense it wasn't to be discussed. People heard that the three Boston guys went to Virginia to meet there with LaRouche and his lawyers--LaRouche was already living in Virginia. Apparently it was that meeting at which they were told to get lost, because right after that they did in fact get lost. In the Boston grand jury, when LaRouche himself testified there, it is reported that prosecutor John Markham asked when the last time was that LaRouche had seen Gelber, and LaRouche announced that he'd seen him at a conference in Wiesbaden, and Mike had asked him when he could go home, and LaRouche had said that he should ask his lawyer. LaRouche must have thought that proved how legally savvy he was--but it really proved how dumb he was, because Markham used it to show that LaRouche had guilty knowledge of the flight of the fugitives.

In any case, the three were whisked away in 1984--without their wives, without anyone knowing anything. Their wives lived without them for years not knowing what was up, only suspecting. The same for their families.

In 1990 or so the three came back and went to Federal prison, in a deal whereby they did a year or so. But the point is that five years of their lives had been wasted being "safehoused" here and there abroad--years of their lives stolen--just because LaRouche was too cowardly and stupid to let the original grand jury take its course, and let the organization take its lumps.

The treatment of these three and their wives was really appalling--this living in No Man's Land, away from family, not allowed to communicate for years--all to shield LaRouche and his organization from a credit card fraud investigation! The morals and the method of the Mafia.

In sum, this is what LaRouche does: steals lives. Steals them altogether, as in the case of Ken Kronberg, or in pieces, as with the people still in the organization, or by squandering them, or stealing family, friends, etc., as in the case of the "Boston Three."

The most appropriate image of Lyndon LaRouche is that of the vampire.

RETURN TO MAIN PAGE